Tyranny of Corporate Dominance Exemplified by Food Supply in Modern-Day Britain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15209/jbsge.v10i4.868Abstract
Food supply incorporates both production and distribution. During the past few decades, large corporations have steadily gained control over food supply. This increased dominance is a result of, among other things, the continuation of neoliberal free-market government policies. Because of the legal mandate of modern corporations, the psychopathic pursuit of profit for their shareholders is a natural undertaking. In particular, four multiples now control a significant segment of the grocery market in Britain. Because of such pervasive presence, the major multiples are shaping the preference and choices of the grocery buying public. Such corporate dominance is a form of tyranny whenever it limits the free will and choices of the population at large. Despite periodic vocal public indignation and outcries against such “abuses”, many middle income citizens continue to drive cars to large supermarkets to do virtually all their grocery shopping conveniently under “one roof”. The scope of action available to the public to redress this imbalance is greatly circumscribed.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).